<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Optimization Demystified-Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arindamchakraborty.com/search-engine-optimization-demystified-part-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arindamchakraborty.com/search-engine-optimization-demystified-part-2</link>
	<description>Where Arindam Chakraborty Makes His Most Personal, Secret Posts!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:35:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Arindam</title>
		<link>http://arindamchakraborty.com/search-engine-optimization-demystified-part-2#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>Arindam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arindamchakraborty.com/?p=340#comment-6519</guid>
		<description>@Gavin,
&gt;&gt;I am going to start finding my own places and not let anyone else know about them as it seems spammers have got hold of Angela’s sites
Not sure about Paul&#039;s links as I am yet to use them. But Angela told me Paul suffers the same fate as she: links being distributed by thieves and ruined by spammers. :(
That said, I don&#039;t think all the websites are spammed. I have been a subscriber of Angela&#039;s membership for several months and I always find that only about 20-30% of the sites become dysfunctional by the time I start backlink buiilding. Your case maybe different though.
Anyway, your approach seems to be a good one. Keeping your links secret is IMO the best strategy. I wish you good luck! To be honest I have also been thinking of doing something similar, apart from using Angela&#039;s backlinks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gavin,</p>
<p>>>I am going to start finding my own places and not let anyone else know about them as it seems spammers have got hold of Angela’s sites</p>
<p>Not sure about Paul's links as I am yet to use them. But Angela told me Paul suffers the same fate as she: links being distributed by thieves and ruined by spammers. <img src='http://arindamchakraborty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>That said, I don't think all the websites are spammed. I have been a subscriber of Angela's membership for several months and I always find that only about 20-30% of the sites become dysfunctional by the time I start backlink buiilding. Your case maybe different though.</p>
<p>Anyway, your approach seems to be a good one. Keeping your links secret is IMO the best strategy. I wish you good luck! To be honest I have also been thinking of doing something similar, apart from using Angela's backlinks <img src='http://arindamchakraborty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Allinson</title>
		<link>http://arindamchakraborty.com/search-engine-optimization-demystified-part-2#comment-6518</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Allinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arindamchakraborty.com/?p=340#comment-6518</guid>
		<description>Arindam,
I agree with what you say and I like your approach however I don&#039;t think many people are likely to spend the time to prove you wrong.
I&#039;m getting excellent results with angelas links however many comments are being blacklisted are you having this problem.
It would be good if this could be an area where we could discuss results using angela and pauls links.  I am going to start finding my own places and not let anyone else know about them as it seems spammers have got hold of Angela&#039;s sites.
Gavin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arindam,</p>
<p>I agree with what you say and I like your approach however I don't think many people are likely to spend the time to prove you wrong.</p>
<p>I'm getting excellent results with angelas links however many comments are being blacklisted are you having this problem.</p>
<p>It would be good if this could be an area where we could discuss results using angela and pauls links.  I am going to start finding my own places and not let anyone else know about them as it seems spammers have got hold of Angela's sites.</p>
<p>Gavin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arindam</title>
		<link>http://arindamchakraborty.com/search-engine-optimization-demystified-part-2#comment-6517</link>
		<dc:creator>Arindam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 21:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arindamchakraborty.com/?p=340#comment-6517</guid>
		<description>Hi Darren
&gt;&gt;I also read the other day how Angela believes there is no need to even vary your anchor text. Just use your target keyword in all of your backlinks.
Not at all, and my article is proof enough of that:
http://arindamchakraborty.com/in-link-building-sometimes-it-pays-to-be-different
Angela&#039;s beliefs may not necessarily be same as me but that is ok. Everyone has diferent set of beliefs ;)
My only question is this: forget about SEO implications, how are you going to rank for other keywords if you always use the same keyword for your anchor text? Of course, if you want to target only one keyword, just like Angela targets her name, then Angela&#039;s advice is perfect! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Darren</p>
<p>>>I also read the other day how Angela believes there is no need to even vary your anchor text. Just use your target keyword in all of your backlinks.</p>
<p>Not at all, and my article is proof enough of that:<br />
<a href="http://arindamchakraborty.com/in-link-building-sometimes-it-pays-to-be-different" >http://arindamchakraborty.com/in-link-building-sometimes-it-pays-to-be-different</a></p>
<p>Angela's beliefs may not necessarily be same as me but that is ok. Everyone has diferent set of beliefs <img src='http://arindamchakraborty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>My only question is this: forget about SEO implications, how are you going to rank for other keywords if you always use the same keyword for your anchor text? Of course, if you want to target only one keyword, just like Angela targets her name, then Angela's advice is perfect! <img src='http://arindamchakraborty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://arindamchakraborty.com/search-engine-optimization-demystified-part-2#comment-6516</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arindamchakraborty.com/?p=340#comment-6516</guid>
		<description>Another informative post. Thank you.
I fully agree with SEO Myth #4. Unless you are building hundreds and thousands of backlinks I can&#039;t see how you can be penalised in any way.
I also read the other day how Angela believes there is no need to even vary your anchor text. Just use your target keyword in all of your backlinks.
Do you agree with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another informative post. Thank you.</p>
<p>I fully agree with SEO Myth #4. Unless you are building hundreds and thousands of backlinks I can't see how you can be penalised in any way.</p>
<p>I also read the other day how Angela believes there is no need to even vary your anchor text. Just use your target keyword in all of your backlinks.</p>
<p>Do you agree with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

